IIdiocracy News
Cedars-Sinai Disavows Nurse Practitioner Who Egged On Trump Assassination Attempt

Cedars-Sinai Disavows Nurse Practitioner Who Egged On Trump Assassination Attempt

After a gunman opened fire at the White House Correspondents' Dinner, an LA nurse practitioner replied: 'Up your game, people.' The hospital says it doesn't reflect their views.

By Sam Caldwell Tuesday, May 5, 2026 at 1:21 PM CDT

LOS ANGELES — Cedars-Sinai Medical Center on Monday distanced itself from a nurse practitioner on its staff who appeared to publicly cheer on the failed attempt to assassinate President Trump at the April 25 White House Correspondents' Association Dinner.

Matthew Shaffer, identified by his LinkedIn profile as a nurse practitioner at Cedars-Sinai Medical Group since March, replied to a social-media post mocking the attempt. After a user named Jason Cosler wrote, "Someone missed again? Who is hiring these people," Shaffer's reply was three words: "Up your game, people."

The screenshot circulated within hours.

President Trump signing executive orders in the days following the dinner. The president was not injured in the April 25 attack.
President Trump signing executive orders in the days following the dinner. The president was not injured in the April 25 attack.

The hospital's response

"Social media postings of individual staff members do not reflect the views or positions of Cedars-Sinai," a spokesperson for the medical center said in a statement. The hospital declined to say whether Shaffer remains employed or is the subject of internal review.

For many of the hospital's patients and donors, the disavowal is not enough. Radio host Doug Wagner publicly challenged the medical center on social media, asking whether the institution approves of "staff cheering on the assassination of the President." The hospital has not, as of publication, responded to the question.

A pattern hospital systems quietly track

Among hospital administrators, the bigger problem is not the individual post — it is the legal exposure of looking the other way. Credentialing boards have begun internal conversations about whether public endorsement of political violence ought to be a per-se professional-conduct issue, even where state licensing law is silent.

"If you have nurses and physicians publicly suggesting a head of state should have been killed, you have a credentialing problem," a Los Angeles–area hospital administrator told Idiocracy News, on condition of anonymity. "And the boards know it. The question is whether they move first or wait for a lawsuit to make them."

The shooting

A Secret Service agent returning fire at the suspected gunman, Cole Tomas Allen, outside the Washington Hilton on April 25.
A Secret Service agent returning fire at the suspected gunman, Cole Tomas Allen, outside the Washington Hilton on April 25.

Cole Tomas Allen, the alleged shooter, was arrested at the scene of the April 25 dinner at the Washington Hilton and faces three federal counts, including the attempted assassination of the president. Federal prosecutors have indicated they will seek the maximum statutory penalties. President Trump was not injured.

The contrast between the federal posture toward the shooter and the casual posture of an apparently credentialed health professional toward the same event is the contrast that has, by Monday afternoon, propelled the story past Cedars-Sinai's communications office and into a broader conversation about a two-tier accountability standard that conservatives have argued, for nearly a decade, runs through American institutions.

"This is a thirty-second decision in any HR office in the country if the politics were reversed," the same Los Angeles administrator told Idiocracy News. "The fact that it's a deliberation at all is what people are noticing."

SC

Sam Caldwell

Staff Writer, Idiocracy News

Comments

Comments are moderated. Be civil, no spam, no links to junk.

No comments yet. Start the conversation.