The mainstream media changed tune on Hunter Biden’s laptop as the investigation inches closer to an indictment. However, the MSM makes a deliberate effort to dissociate Joe Biden from Hunters’ misadventures.
The laptop is currently under the FBI and could serve as crucial evidence for money laundering and tax evasion allegations being investigated.
The Washington Post reported that its security researchers verified about 22,000 emails from Biden’s laptop using cryptographic signatures from Google and other sources.
WAPO’s analysis was carried out by Johns Hopkins University security researcher Matt Green and former National Security Agency forensic expert Jake Williams.
The outlet had initially claimed that the emails could not be verified and were likely part of a “broader Russian disinformation campaign.”
Facebook and Twitter also restricted posts on Hunter Biden’s laptop using Washington Post’s fact-checking. Similarly, over 50 former intelligence officials backed the Russian disinformation narrative in a massive coverup.
Similarly, The New York Times also acknowledged emails from Hunter Biden’s laptop while discussing how he had paid off a significant amount of tax owed.
“Those emails were obtained by The New York Times from a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop,” The Times wrote.
Some of the emails related to the Chinese Communist Party-backed CEFC China Energy which allegedly paid Biden about $5 million.
Similarly, Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings allegedly paid the young Biden about $1 million per year. Former President Donald Trump’s calls to investigate young Biden on these questionable dealings led to his impeachment.
Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee chair US Sen. Ron Johnson (R – WI) described the Times’ acknowledgment of Hunter’s laptop as surprising during an appearance on WABC.
“I am just amazed that the New York Times just now came to the conclusion that the Hunter Biden laptop was genuine,” he said.
After New York Post reported on the young Biden’s laptop, Vox blasted Conservative news outlets for running with the story arguing that “Careful investigative journalists would take some time to ascertain what actually happened here,” something Vox itself never did. The outlet, however, ran with the mainstream narrative and downplayed the incident.
Meanwhile, Vox has “revisited” Biden’s laptop story and admitted that it was not a Russian disinformation campaign.
The outlet, however, claims that “TheTimes only vouched for certain emails they’d authenticated,” which was a whopping 22,000 according to WaPo, another journalistic failure by Vox.
The timing of the mainstream media’s change in tune on Hunter Biden’s laptop is significant. Multiple witnesses, including federal investigators, will testify in the coming weeks about Hunter’s questionable dealings with foreign governments, including our traditional adversaries such as China, when his father was the Vice President.
Ater 532 days since the initial story broke about Hunter Biden’s laptop, CNN finally admits the laptop investigation along with it is authentic.
“There are a lot of issues that the Justice Department are looking into, including, of course, this laptop – on the right-wing – has featured a lot of stories about Hunter Biden,” CNN’s Evan Perez acknowledged. “We know the FBI has possession of it and that they believe it is his laptop.”
“The contents are his [Hunter’s],” he said, noting Hunter’s “very, very bad” looking corruption in Ukraine when Joe Biden was vice president.
The story has been building momentum in the left-wing media since the New York Times acknowledged the story around Hunter Biden’s laptop. It only took the liberal news outlets nearly 2 years to publish the story. We all remember having big tech help with censoring posts that contained information about Hunter Biden’s laptop.
Even disgraced former CNN president Jeff Zucker labeled the story as a “Breitbard rabbit hole” and unworthy of coverage.
I do think, on the Breitbart, New York Post, Fox News rabbit hole of Hunter Biden which I don’t think anybody outside of that world understood. Last night, the Wall Street Journal reported that their review of all corporate records, showed no role for Joe Biden on the Chinese deal. And yes, I do put more credibility in the Wall Street Journal than I do in The New York Post.
Well, this rabbit hole goes deep with even Democrat senators and representatives claiming that the laptop was “debunked” and an “anti-Biden propaganda campaign” from Russia.
Remember this all happened before the 2020 elections when big news about someone’s son being investigated could have had huge results on the election. This sounds a lot like election tampering that the Democrats love to blame on Russia and Trump. Before the 2020 election, Joe Biden claimed the incriminating emails on Hunter’s laptop were instead just “a smear campaign” and “a bunch of garbage,” citing a Politico story written by Natasha Bertrand that claimed 51 former intel officials said the laptop was Russian disinformation. CNN has since hired Natasha Bertrand as a White House reporter.
Hunter’s laptop is in the hands of the FBI who famously spied on Trump’s campaign, so we can’t expect much to come from this investigation with so much swap water murking up this investigation
With Hunter Biden’s art show not even open yet in New York City, already anonymous buyers are grabbing the artwork up. On Oct. 1st Biden did a “pop up” presentation in Los Angeles with at least 5 of his art pieces being sold for $75,000 each.
Supposedly, no one knows the identities of the buyers, nor is it known exactly how many pieces of artwork were sold after the presentation. “But most of those allowed to buy works are long-term, private collectors with the gallery,” a source familiar with the sale said.
With the Liberal Media constantly attacking the Trump family when he was in office, even going after young Barron at times, we wonder where are these Media idiots today? “The whole thing is a really bad idea,” former chief White House ethics lawyer Richard Painter told The Washington Post. “The initial reaction a lot of people are going to have is that he’s capitalizing on being the son of a president and wants people to give him a lot of money.” But, yet the liberal media does not seem concerned with this paid-for access it seems to the President.